Mr Morić, thank you for the very interesting interviews that you host. A few points of criticism with regards to some of Mr Gosselin points - and some of these points have also come up in some of your interviews with other personalities:
Esotericism and gnosticism have a dark side and a Light side, but many of your interviewees concentrate mainly on the dark side which gives the impression that anything and everything esoteric or spiritual is potentially bad or negative. Moreover, the meaning of Gnosticism is regulatory conflated with occultism. The dictionary definitions of these words tell us the it's about hidden and deeper knowledge that's only accessible through deep study or understanding underlying concepts.
For example, a lot of people would nowadays avoid Carl Jung's work because some people simply group him in with the "dark gnostics" without having any concept of his work, considering that Jung's father was a Protestant pastor and he grew up in a religious family and environment and he never rejected Christianity. The issue is that people who comment on Jung's work know nothing about his works in the sense that they had never actually studied it so they misattribute it.
In a sense there seems to be a general trend within alternative media to regurgitate more or less the same talking points about the evils of gnosticism and esotericism thereby making it all sound to be evil, but what about genuine deep inner development? Can it be done at all without delving deeper into the human psyche? I would say no, it's not really possible. It's not as if people in the West can claim to be unaware of personal development as a positive practice rather than a negative one, since hundreds of thousands if not millions of books have been written about it. We would also have to reject more or less the entire spectrum of psychoanalysis and counseling if we want to claim that we are unaware of the positive sides.
The other issue is that the world is indeed going through a very major transition. We are moving from a sensate/material age to a spiritual/religious age - I can recommend the works of Pitirim A. Sorokin (a Christian) in this regard - [please see his book: 'The Crisis of Our Age' [1941], it is highly recommended].
Furthermore, we are indeed moving from an age of material abundance to an age of material scarcity, the positive side being that we are moving to an age of Spiritual Abundance, so the abundance will shift from the material to the spiritual, while material affluence and comforts will probably reduce in parts of the world due to a REAL decline in some key resources:
Unfortunately in alternative media circles there is very little understanding or research into the actual realities of the state of energy supplies in the world, meaning that some of the foremost leaders in the alt-media are under the impression there's no energy crisis, yet that aspect is one of the most important reasons for many of the events happening in the world currently. The PTB know this is happening and many of their actions are ways to try and manage the situation to their advantage without losing power. Believe it or not, The Club of Rome was correct in this one point: That the world will reach limits in some key commodities. Alt-media missed this because they threw the baby out with the bathwater and rejected everything that they predicted, but on this point they were not wrong and that's what the Great Reset and the promotion of "renewables" is all about.
For instance in another of your podcasts with Mr J. Nordangard he stated that there's an abundance of energy resources and the idea that there's Limits to Growth is just a conspiracy to create an artificial sense of scarcity. It's the same with Mr James Corbett - he's also apparently under the same impression. I would like to venture that these gentlemen have not done their homework properly and they suffer from huge blind spots when it comes to the subject of energy ...
I would like to invite you Mr Morić to familiarize yourself with the work of Prof. Simon Michaux. Here is a video presentation by S. Michaux that puts everything in context (if you ignore the woke intro and just focus on the statistics).
I also recommend reading these reports of his - please see charts and graphs - this has all be meticulosity researched, so far nobody can prove him wrong:
I do not support Prof Michaux's ideas for solutions to the predicament, which seem to be mainly globalist (if you read my most recent essays you will see I propose decentralization as the only real solution), but as far as his assessment of resources is concerned, he's one of the best in his field. However, there are also other researchers who have done similar work and have come to the same conclusions, for example Mark Mills:
Interesting interview and I agreed with most of what was said, but I am always surprised and puzzled when people who talk about God, the Creator, or quote scripture then use obscenities. I ended up turning it off after the guest’s second offense. I wouldn’t be able to recommend it as I choose not to promote or perpetuate things I disagree with and I would be embarrassed to recommend something with crude language in it.
It’s too bad to ruin good content with bad language.
Mr Morić, thank you for the very interesting interviews that you host. A few points of criticism with regards to some of Mr Gosselin points - and some of these points have also come up in some of your interviews with other personalities:
Esotericism and gnosticism have a dark side and a Light side, but many of your interviewees concentrate mainly on the dark side which gives the impression that anything and everything esoteric or spiritual is potentially bad or negative. Moreover, the meaning of Gnosticism is regulatory conflated with occultism. The dictionary definitions of these words tell us the it's about hidden and deeper knowledge that's only accessible through deep study or understanding underlying concepts.
For example, a lot of people would nowadays avoid Carl Jung's work because some people simply group him in with the "dark gnostics" without having any concept of his work, considering that Jung's father was a Protestant pastor and he grew up in a religious family and environment and he never rejected Christianity. The issue is that people who comment on Jung's work know nothing about his works in the sense that they had never actually studied it so they misattribute it.
In a sense there seems to be a general trend within alternative media to regurgitate more or less the same talking points about the evils of gnosticism and esotericism thereby making it all sound to be evil, but what about genuine deep inner development? Can it be done at all without delving deeper into the human psyche? I would say no, it's not really possible. It's not as if people in the West can claim to be unaware of personal development as a positive practice rather than a negative one, since hundreds of thousands if not millions of books have been written about it. We would also have to reject more or less the entire spectrum of psychoanalysis and counseling if we want to claim that we are unaware of the positive sides.
The other issue is that the world is indeed going through a very major transition. We are moving from a sensate/material age to a spiritual/religious age - I can recommend the works of Pitirim A. Sorokin (a Christian) in this regard - [please see his book: 'The Crisis of Our Age' [1941], it is highly recommended].
Furthermore, we are indeed moving from an age of material abundance to an age of material scarcity, the positive side being that we are moving to an age of Spiritual Abundance, so the abundance will shift from the material to the spiritual, while material affluence and comforts will probably reduce in parts of the world due to a REAL decline in some key resources:
Unfortunately in alternative media circles there is very little understanding or research into the actual realities of the state of energy supplies in the world, meaning that some of the foremost leaders in the alt-media are under the impression there's no energy crisis, yet that aspect is one of the most important reasons for many of the events happening in the world currently. The PTB know this is happening and many of their actions are ways to try and manage the situation to their advantage without losing power. Believe it or not, The Club of Rome was correct in this one point: That the world will reach limits in some key commodities. Alt-media missed this because they threw the baby out with the bathwater and rejected everything that they predicted, but on this point they were not wrong and that's what the Great Reset and the promotion of "renewables" is all about.
For instance in another of your podcasts with Mr J. Nordangard he stated that there's an abundance of energy resources and the idea that there's Limits to Growth is just a conspiracy to create an artificial sense of scarcity. It's the same with Mr James Corbett - he's also apparently under the same impression. I would like to venture that these gentlemen have not done their homework properly and they suffer from huge blind spots when it comes to the subject of energy ...
I would like to invite you Mr Morić to familiarize yourself with the work of Prof. Simon Michaux. Here is a video presentation by S. Michaux that puts everything in context (if you ignore the woke intro and just focus on the statistics).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MBVmnKuBocc
[It's worth watching to the end].
I also recommend reading these reports of his - please see charts and graphs - this has all be meticulosity researched, so far nobody can prove him wrong:
https://tupa.gtk.fi/raportti/arkisto/16_2021.pdf
https://tupa.gtk.fi/raportti/arkisto/42_2021.pdf
I do not support Prof Michaux's ideas for solutions to the predicament, which seem to be mainly globalist (if you read my most recent essays you will see I propose decentralization as the only real solution), but as far as his assessment of resources is concerned, he's one of the best in his field. However, there are also other researchers who have done similar work and have come to the same conclusions, for example Mark Mills:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sgOEGKDVvsg
Best regards,
J.J. Montagnier
PS: A more accessible interview with S. Michaux can be found here - perhaps you could consider getting him on your show?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_QzSlXEEyw8
Interesting interview and I agreed with most of what was said, but I am always surprised and puzzled when people who talk about God, the Creator, or quote scripture then use obscenities. I ended up turning it off after the guest’s second offense. I wouldn’t be able to recommend it as I choose not to promote or perpetuate things I disagree with and I would be embarrassed to recommend something with crude language in it.
It’s too bad to ruin good content with bad language.