009 of www.WorldNotEnough.com gives his take on the Great Reset project for world government, our drone-swarmed technocratic future, what's behind BRICS and multipolarity, American Empire, myopia in alternative media, viable solutions, why he's relatively optimistic, his research methods, and more!
Multi-polar world or 3-bloc world per Orwell's 1984? Same thing? A 3-bloc world can be balanced forever by the ruling class / conspiracy manipulation. EuroAsia (Europe and Russia minus UK) are to be one of the blocs, thus the Euro-Russian (Ukraine) war perhaps.
Multi-Polar beyond a few Blocs wouldn't work.
I disagree that everything is short-sighted sex, money and power. Ideology and philosophy on many planes count though in a complex way.
LaRouchies really discredit themselves claiming CBDC social credit is no different than credit reports.
Art is the project of the ruling class / conspiracy to create the state of mind they think will transition us to world tyranny.
Central Banking and its global organizing is the problem. They create money out of nothing enabling them to pursue their tyrannical programs. The rest is noise.
British Empire elite felt they needed a war to prevent Germany from challenging their globalist empire. Empire of the City by Knuth is a good reference.
interesting convo. however he misses the point that the the billionaires, wef people ect. are just puppets not the ones who actually run the show. the so called ancient families are the ones who run it.
A well-informed person would not argue for the possibility of changing the system from within; he must surely know about the pervasive, ruthless law fare (Dr Reiner Fuellmich and many others who tried) and the assassinations(3 African Presidents, Dr Andreas Novak and many others) just since 2020 in the deadly biowarfare inflicted upon the ignorant public. We have run out of time. I doubt if he is his own man.
Would you please comment on the scientist Dr Douglas D Vogt (careful, a second Douglas Vogt seems to exist) “Unveiling the Geological Evidence for the 12,000 Year Cycle of Climate Disasters” since I cannot find a fault with his shocking, existential revelations.
One could reply to many points in this podcast, but here's just a couple of issues:
Please don't take this too personally Mr Moric, but Mr Passio is an ex-satanist, so why would anybody who consider themselves Christian take him seriously if he hasn't actually become a fully committed born-again Christian? (It's just a logical question). Full disclosure: I have listened to him in the past to get the other side of the spectrum, but I didn't get stuck on his world-view.
"Equality" is of course pure Utopianism because nations and peoples have very obviously not been created equal (as per the Bible, and this is also just a very simple observation of reality). However, no matter how many real-world case studies are pointed out to prove this, such examples are ignored ... so what we are dealing with here is pure utopian equality-ideology, notwithstanding real-world evidence to the contrary:
Please (!) tell us how 'Saint' Nelson Mandela's Rainbow Nation project has turned out in South Africa? Yet nobody in the alt-sphere wants to "touch this" subject. Is this not part of GEOPOLITICS?
When you are ready ... Let's just talk REAL Geopolitics and Empire: which would also incorporate the Southern Hemisphere ... [fully!].
Until then you are (i.m.h.o.) just globalists ... in anti-globalist "skinsuits"... as 'Neoliberal Feudalism' might express it ...(although I wouldn't want to put words in his mouth ...).
See also a comment I left on Alexander Dugin's Substack:
"Some people claim that the forerunner of Western 'wokeness' and woke-ideology in general was the global anti-apartheid movement of the 80's and 90's that promoted the forced integration of 10 different cultural and linguistic groups into an artificial multicultural "utopia" (with the unspoken objective being to dilute all those cultures) under the banner of [Saint?] Nelson Mandela's "Rainbow Nation" concept in South Africa featuring "Unity in Diversity" and "Ubuntu" which were the forerunners of Western "diversity" and "inclusiveness" (while the New South Africa was also one of the first countries to introduce same-sex marriages), championed by the woke everywhere in the West. Here is an article that makes some of these claims - any thoughts?"
Of course this issue continues to be ignored: Show us some serious engagement with this subject and then "Geopolitics and Empire" (and "The World is not Enough") might truly become GEOPOLITICAL in a real sense, as in not only Northern-Hemispherian!
You might deny this, but both yourself and Mr 009 has supported this - and does support this by the nature of avoiding responses to similar comments on the subject. Just because you ignore this does not mean that history will ignore this.
To summarise: both 'the left' and 'the right' in the Northern Hemisphere (East AND West) have promoted various forms of integration-ism and collectivisation over the decades with civilians (Left AND right) promoting and supporting it ... So all this 'SURPRISE" just seem contrived ...
Do you think it’s preferable that we should all stay in our racial ethno-states and there’s no integration whatsoever with anybody anywhere? You know I’ve seen this attitude throughout the alternative community. Correct me if I am mistaken, but what you really want is for nothing to change ever. Any progress you will say is the fault of the globalists. But unfortunately, because of technology, the world is going to go through constant upheaval maybe for hundreds of years. That’s reality.
Not at all - that's not what I'm saying (that we should all stay in our racial ethno-states with no integration whatsoever) - I'm saying that forced integration leads to more problems than fewer as can be observed in South Africa today. I'm also saying that the S.A.-model was so successful from a globalist perspective that it was rolled-out under the banner of the woke movement everywhere else. You see, the issue is that many people (in particular in "alt-media" it would seem) is that they want The Best of All Worlds ...
They want to claim to be "anti-globalist" while being globalist at the same time, example: a global economy is a globalist position (as you make clear you support in this discussion). Globalism is global centralization and a global economy benefits primarily the centre (i.e. the largest economies that are also the main drivers of global centralization) while the peripheries get crumbs - in other words globalisation is just present day imperialism on a large scale. That's just obvious - or at least it should be ... So why would you support that if you are against "the globalists"? Or, perhaps you are not? Fair enough then, but rather make your position clear. However, if that's the case then what's the point of your Substack?.
Long-term forced centralisation undermines and dilutes genuine diversity - as in the preservation of unique languages and cultures - that should be obvious too.
Forced integrationism (i.e. multiculturalism as an ideology - which the leading nations in the West AND East practices) is globalist because it is centralist and collectivist. We are not speaking about the natural integration of cultures and ethnicity here, but rather it being implemented ideologically and on a policy level - everywhere - also in BRICS notwithstanding claims to the contrary. An example of this is exactly the case study of South Africa, but nobody wants to study THE CASE STUDY ... (why is that?) Has the project been successful, or not? Is there "Unity in Diversity" in that country today?
A valuable exercise would be for "alt-dissidents" to define what a dissident actually is - and what dissidents stand for.
// a global economy is a globalist position (as you make clear you support in this discussion).//
We already have a global economy whether we like it or not. The question is how do we respond? Do we try to tear it all down through mass resistance or do we get involved in the political process and attempt to change things from within?
// in other words globalisation is just present day imperialism on a large scale. That's just obvious - or at least it should be ... So why would you support that if you are against "the globalists"? Or, perhaps you are not? Fair enough then, but rather make your position clear. However, if that's the case then what's the point of your Substack?.//
What i support is our freedoms and rights. There is no democracy without civil rights including freedom of speech, the press, worship, association, travel, and right to work. These are the things we need to focus on. It would be exceedingly difficult to decentralise many of our basic global systems, such as global air traffic. There has to be a central management system and rules and regulations in order for there to be airplane service throughout the world. If you want convenient international travel that is ...
My sincere belief is that we need to engage in judo with the globalist instead of karate if you understand my meaning. Use their weight against them. If they want a global government then we the people need to ensure that our freedoms and rights are protected. So far, that is not what is happening. People are just opposing everything the globalists are doing without thinking through what are the long term pros and cons of their policies. It isn't all bad, though there are definitely some nefarious things they are planning.
That's not what I'm saying - but how do you know Passio is not still part of that cult if he's not fully denounced that (by becoming a born-again Christian?) - which is why I view him with scepticism even though I personally also learned a lot from his insights.
Multi-polar world or 3-bloc world per Orwell's 1984? Same thing? A 3-bloc world can be balanced forever by the ruling class / conspiracy manipulation. EuroAsia (Europe and Russia minus UK) are to be one of the blocs, thus the Euro-Russian (Ukraine) war perhaps.
Multi-Polar beyond a few Blocs wouldn't work.
I disagree that everything is short-sighted sex, money and power. Ideology and philosophy on many planes count though in a complex way.
LaRouchies really discredit themselves claiming CBDC social credit is no different than credit reports.
Art is the project of the ruling class / conspiracy to create the state of mind they think will transition us to world tyranny.
Central Banking and its global organizing is the problem. They create money out of nothing enabling them to pursue their tyrannical programs. The rest is noise.
British Empire elite felt they needed a war to prevent Germany from challenging their globalist empire. Empire of the City by Knuth is a good reference.
Substack, outstanding discussion, let's get more of that please
interesting convo. however he misses the point that the the billionaires, wef people ect. are just puppets not the ones who actually run the show. the so called ancient families are the ones who run it.
That was my take too. What we see is a shadow. The ones we see are placeholders
A well-informed person would not argue for the possibility of changing the system from within; he must surely know about the pervasive, ruthless law fare (Dr Reiner Fuellmich and many others who tried) and the assassinations(3 African Presidents, Dr Andreas Novak and many others) just since 2020 in the deadly biowarfare inflicted upon the ignorant public. We have run out of time. I doubt if he is his own man.
Would you please comment on the scientist Dr Douglas D Vogt (careful, a second Douglas Vogt seems to exist) “Unveiling the Geological Evidence for the 12,000 Year Cycle of Climate Disasters” since I cannot find a fault with his shocking, existential revelations.
One could reply to many points in this podcast, but here's just a couple of issues:
Please don't take this too personally Mr Moric, but Mr Passio is an ex-satanist, so why would anybody who consider themselves Christian take him seriously if he hasn't actually become a fully committed born-again Christian? (It's just a logical question). Full disclosure: I have listened to him in the past to get the other side of the spectrum, but I didn't get stuck on his world-view.
"Equality" is of course pure Utopianism because nations and peoples have very obviously not been created equal (as per the Bible, and this is also just a very simple observation of reality). However, no matter how many real-world case studies are pointed out to prove this, such examples are ignored ... so what we are dealing with here is pure utopian equality-ideology, notwithstanding real-world evidence to the contrary:
Please (!) tell us how 'Saint' Nelson Mandela's Rainbow Nation project has turned out in South Africa? Yet nobody in the alt-sphere wants to "touch this" subject. Is this not part of GEOPOLITICS?
When you are ready ... Let's just talk REAL Geopolitics and Empire: which would also incorporate the Southern Hemisphere ... [fully!].
Until then you are (i.m.h.o.) just globalists ... in anti-globalist "skinsuits"... as 'Neoliberal Feudalism' might express it ...(although I wouldn't want to put words in his mouth ...).
See also a comment I left on Alexander Dugin's Substack:
https://alexanderdugin.substack.com/p/the-western-modernity-is-antichrist/comments?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=web&utm_campaign=post_viewer
"Some people claim that the forerunner of Western 'wokeness' and woke-ideology in general was the global anti-apartheid movement of the 80's and 90's that promoted the forced integration of 10 different cultural and linguistic groups into an artificial multicultural "utopia" (with the unspoken objective being to dilute all those cultures) under the banner of [Saint?] Nelson Mandela's "Rainbow Nation" concept in South Africa featuring "Unity in Diversity" and "Ubuntu" which were the forerunners of Western "diversity" and "inclusiveness" (while the New South Africa was also one of the first countries to introduce same-sex marriages), championed by the woke everywhere in the West. Here is an article that makes some of these claims - any thoughts?"
https://archive.today/2021.06.14-205543/http://thesaker.is/apartheid-vs-apartheid-in-the-time-of-wokeness/
Of course this issue continues to be ignored: Show us some serious engagement with this subject and then "Geopolitics and Empire" (and "The World is not Enough") might truly become GEOPOLITICAL in a real sense, as in not only Northern-Hemispherian!
You might deny this, but both yourself and Mr 009 has supported this - and does support this by the nature of avoiding responses to similar comments on the subject. Just because you ignore this does not mean that history will ignore this.
To summarise: both 'the left' and 'the right' in the Northern Hemisphere (East AND West) have promoted various forms of integration-ism and collectivisation over the decades with civilians (Left AND right) promoting and supporting it ... So all this 'SURPRISE" just seem contrived ...
Do you think it’s preferable that we should all stay in our racial ethno-states and there’s no integration whatsoever with anybody anywhere? You know I’ve seen this attitude throughout the alternative community. Correct me if I am mistaken, but what you really want is for nothing to change ever. Any progress you will say is the fault of the globalists. But unfortunately, because of technology, the world is going to go through constant upheaval maybe for hundreds of years. That’s reality.
Not at all - that's not what I'm saying (that we should all stay in our racial ethno-states with no integration whatsoever) - I'm saying that forced integration leads to more problems than fewer as can be observed in South Africa today. I'm also saying that the S.A.-model was so successful from a globalist perspective that it was rolled-out under the banner of the woke movement everywhere else. You see, the issue is that many people (in particular in "alt-media" it would seem) is that they want The Best of All Worlds ...
They want to claim to be "anti-globalist" while being globalist at the same time, example: a global economy is a globalist position (as you make clear you support in this discussion). Globalism is global centralization and a global economy benefits primarily the centre (i.e. the largest economies that are also the main drivers of global centralization) while the peripheries get crumbs - in other words globalisation is just present day imperialism on a large scale. That's just obvious - or at least it should be ... So why would you support that if you are against "the globalists"? Or, perhaps you are not? Fair enough then, but rather make your position clear. However, if that's the case then what's the point of your Substack?.
Long-term forced centralisation undermines and dilutes genuine diversity - as in the preservation of unique languages and cultures - that should be obvious too.
Forced integrationism (i.e. multiculturalism as an ideology - which the leading nations in the West AND East practices) is globalist because it is centralist and collectivist. We are not speaking about the natural integration of cultures and ethnicity here, but rather it being implemented ideologically and on a policy level - everywhere - also in BRICS notwithstanding claims to the contrary. An example of this is exactly the case study of South Africa, but nobody wants to study THE CASE STUDY ... (why is that?) Has the project been successful, or not? Is there "Unity in Diversity" in that country today?
A valuable exercise would be for "alt-dissidents" to define what a dissident actually is - and what dissidents stand for.
//A valuable exercise would be for "alt-dissidents" to define what a dissident actually is - and what dissidents stand for.//
I agree with this ... what exactly are we supposed to be doing and standing for
// a global economy is a globalist position (as you make clear you support in this discussion).//
We already have a global economy whether we like it or not. The question is how do we respond? Do we try to tear it all down through mass resistance or do we get involved in the political process and attempt to change things from within?
// in other words globalisation is just present day imperialism on a large scale. That's just obvious - or at least it should be ... So why would you support that if you are against "the globalists"? Or, perhaps you are not? Fair enough then, but rather make your position clear. However, if that's the case then what's the point of your Substack?.//
What i support is our freedoms and rights. There is no democracy without civil rights including freedom of speech, the press, worship, association, travel, and right to work. These are the things we need to focus on. It would be exceedingly difficult to decentralise many of our basic global systems, such as global air traffic. There has to be a central management system and rules and regulations in order for there to be airplane service throughout the world. If you want convenient international travel that is ...
My sincere belief is that we need to engage in judo with the globalist instead of karate if you understand my meaning. Use their weight against them. If they want a global government then we the people need to ensure that our freedoms and rights are protected. So far, that is not what is happening. People are just opposing everything the globalists are doing without thinking through what are the long term pros and cons of their policies. It isn't all bad, though there are definitely some nefarious things they are planning.
that's like saying I can't use any knowledge or book or material if it doesn't come from a Christian...I totally reject that premise
That's not what I'm saying - but how do you know Passio is not still part of that cult if he's not fully denounced that (by becoming a born-again Christian?) - which is why I view him with scepticism even though I personally also learned a lot from his insights.