13 Comments
User's avatar
Georgina Carmichael's avatar

🇨🇦wondering if Mark Carney’s Election promise of building affordable houses includes communities all set with Solar power, electric vehicles and surveillance in Ready , turnkey 15 Minute Cities ‼️???

Canadians are in Trouble‼️🙏❤️

Expand full comment
davmack's avatar

James Corbett's recent "Who is Mark Carney?" is well worth a watch.

Expand full comment
davmack's avatar

Great interview from a Christian perspective that I share - thank you.

Expand full comment
the lilac dragonfly's avatar

Who pays taxes? Not the airlines or the shipping companies. End users are the only ones who pay all the taxes. That man, whoever he is, is recommending WE - the little guys, the end users - pay taxes to the U. N. When Trump talks about implementing tariffs, that is a tax on end users. It may be constitutional (which the IRS is not), but it is still taxing end users. The companies pass the tariff/tax on.

One time a friend was complaining that people who rent don’t pay property taxes. I disagreed and said they DO pay property taxes. He was adamant that they don’t. The landowner doesn’t just pay the property taxes out of the goodness of his heart; he passes the tax on to the renter, including the cost in the rent. I couldn’t believe a 70-year-old man couldn’t understand that. As far as I know, he never did get it.

Ecumenism has never been a good idea. Unity based on truth is the only appropriate unity. Labels with no inherent meaning are less than useless; they are deceptive and confusing. The word “Christianity” is a word that is not helpful in communicating truth. It means just about anything and many of those things are evil.

“It was the best of religions; it was the worst of religions. It brought life, love, and compassion to a dark and cruel world. It also brought torture, repression, ignorance, slavery, and death to an innocent world. It burned with Light and Truth. It also burned the Bible and those who believed it.

“Those who adhered to it built universities, hospitals, and orphanages. They also justified poverty, exploitation, war, and conquest. They brought food to the hungry, medicine to the sick, work to the destitute, and hope to the hopeless. They filled the earth with contempt for man, contempt for God's creation, and contempt for God.

“What is this thing called ‘Christianity’? The Bible does not tell us. The Bible talks about something else.”

Copernicus and the Jews: The Separation of Church and Faith (page 186) by Daniel Gruber

Regarding college protesters: There is a significant difference between non-citizens openly and disruptively supporting terrorists and citizens talking about what they believe.

Yeshua WILL rule physically in Yerushalayim/Jerusalem, but that will be after all the nations gather together against Israel and divide the land. Yeshua will return as Messiah, son of David, to rescue Israel from complete annihilation, He will give Israel all the land God promised to Abraham and to his descendants (from the river to the river), and He will be King over all the earth. He will judge the nations by how they have treated Israel.

Expand full comment
J. P. Kerber's avatar

I think Truth Unmuted has done some excellent work, but I would argue against Hrvoje's encouragement to Jesse that speaks, approvingly, of the fact that "you don't hit people over the head with the Bible - many times you barely even mention it."

Bury the Bible - is that supposed to be a good thing?

I'm not saying that is what Jesse has done, but it sounds like the perception of it is what Hrvoje is celebrating. I'm sure Jesse has reasons for making the decisions he does, about what to say and what not to say, and I am in no way making a negative comment about his work, but rather I am delighted to see his work on the internet.

Speaking, however, with approval about the avoidance of mentioning the Bible too much or hitting people over the head with it reflects a lack of understanding of the nature of the gospel itself. Just Goole "the gospel is an offense" and as a pleasant surprise you will see, at the top of the list, the voices of those, few though they may be, that still recognize the fact that the gospel is inherently offensive, as a stumbling block, as foolishness. That is also what the Bible says (1 Cor. 1:23). If your goal is to avoid offense, or to pre-empt critique by sending people away, then you will never be able to share the gospel in its legitimate form. We don't preempt rejection, we accept it as part of sharing the gospel. (In case it is not clear, what I am saying is that presenting and defending the gospel is not the same thing as exaggerating the reaction of those who oppose Christianity and give them a trigger warning with respect to your podcast.)

Everyone who defends the gospel, in truth, will be accused of "hitting people over the head with it." Those are always the words that are used when the gospel is preached outside of a church (where, in theory, people already agree with it). The gospel does not land softly on anyone's head. Anyone who shares the gospel routinely must, I believe, struggle with how, when, and with what degree of assertion they will speak. But your words are like taking the issue and smashing it into a brick wall. No nuance. No understanding of the difficulty of discerning what to say. What would your advice be to Stephen, Hrvoje - that he could have avoided being stoned if he had just backed off a bit and talked more about other things? Or to John the Baptist - that he should know that people get tired of being beaten over the head about marrying their brother's wife? If you share the gospel. you are going to take a hit for it. And if you speak for approval or speak only to those who already approve, you will always be off track.

It seems to be a pattern, Hrvoje, that you shut down, or cast aspersions on those who make a legitimate effort to express the gospel, and who do so not to be a nuisance, or to intentionally offend, but because the time is short, because there is no other message that matters, because any hope that someone might listen is worth accepting the insult, because we are to proclaim the truth with boldness, and because we live to please God not man. Yes, you acknowledge your own faith, and that is a good thing, but you routinely give voice to those who oppose biblical Christianity and, as here, reflect a strong orientation toward muffling proclamation of the truth in it 's genuine, bold and offensive form.

The Neo-gnostic message is all over the internet, all over alternative media, and nobody is standing up to it with the response that our solution is in God alone. Rather, our solution is in finding the right prepping combo, in the right strategy of avoiding tracking, getting those goats and chickens in line. Christians are not stating plainly and boldly that our job is to pursue the kingdom of God and to live by faith, and that faith is enough. It is our first priority. It is where our heart runs. I'm not hearing that anywhere. All I see is the minuet of politeness, another variant of the argument that in civil society we just don't say those things, we don't speak loudly, without reservation, about the fact that our only salvation is through that offensive gospel.

Expand full comment
Squid4's avatar

Gents, you're over the target. Call on Jehovah Sabaoth. Nehemiah 4:14. Stand. We don't bow to anyone but Yeshua HaMashiach, abba Yahweh. Rev 22:11. God bless y'all 🙂

Expand full comment
sian jones's avatar

WOW!! just had to send an authentication code number to Google in order to post a response!! Don't panic, Google, not terrorism- or "hate-speech-related. Simple comment on Hrvoje's post. So, Hrvoje. Reckon the "Shilleet" are applying Hegelian Dialectic to all religions 'n Spiritual disciplines, aka pit Islam against Christianity (as in people of opposing faiths) against one another .... And the rising phoenix from the ashes will be ..... #SpiritualCommunism. That is, the plebs will be "happy" to live their lives vicariously, through the medium (medea?) of film, social media, meditation and of course CYMATICS .... ie sound and vibration (music). The sidekick of Schwab said himself in an interview ... "Keep the plebs happy with drugs, altered states of reality (sic)" and allegedly. Of course. No real life, global and life-enhancing, experiential experiences for us!! No sireee .... All limited to lives spent in 12 x 8 boxes with no sunlight, no Nature. No metaphysical growth. Dead from the inside out. THeir Plan.

Expand full comment
sian jones's avatar

WOW ... just had to submit an 'authentic

Expand full comment
Saint 
Michael's avatar

I would highly recommend David Benjamin on YouTube and go through his books of the New Testament. He also has a website called Christiansneedthegospel.com. You can download eBooks for free. Just put 0 in the money box. David Benjamin has a book called new covenant VS New Testament ministry. I believe 99% of the church doesn't know about it, but it's huge.

I also believe that the institutional church is the apostate church right before our eyes.

Expand full comment
Nicholas Scholten's avatar

Hrvoje, would you rather be in Mexico or Croatia?

Expand full comment
Nicholas Scholten's avatar

What if they created formal religion so we don't fight back. So, we are just going to watch the continued demolition of our planet for their gain?

I recently read the book Orthodoxy and the Religion of the future. It discusses new age religion. https://www.sainthermanmonastery.com/product-p/orf.htm

Expand full comment
sian jones's avatar

The 'formal religion' will be Spiritual Communism. Contained in a box, where only escape will be thru meditation and via our personal 'archangels' !! Wot a joke aka YOKE !

Expand full comment
sourapples's avatar

Glad he talked about Prospera

Expand full comment